Recent activity

Election Day Doinks with my girls. #Doink https://t.co/c5yef378UH

Not yet scored.

Memphis to Mountian City. It’s been a busy week getting out the vote. https://t.co/tPKM9F6w0e

Not yet scored.

Today’s Election Day. Don’t take it for granted, folks. https://t.co/AOZqsL7Kqg

Not yet scored.

I was thinking the same thing about you,

This is a fragment with no identifiable target, context, or policy content.Show full reasoning

They did not come to my office. You’re completely wrong about that. I did not take anybody’s money.

This is a short personal denial/rebuttal by Hawley to an accusation, but it does not name or target a specific member of Congress, the opposing party, or his own party.Show full reasoning

The FDA, the commissioner, Marty Makary, promised me he would do a study,

This is a brief factual statement referencing a promise made by FDA Commissioner Marty Makary to conduct a study.Show full reasoning

Why’d you do it? Was it worth it? … This is what accountability looks like, of which you have none. You helped fraudsters defraud your state and this government of $9 billion. And you got a fat campaign contribution out…

This is a harsh, direct personal accusation (likely from a hearing/interrogation) against an unnamed individual accused of enabling fraud and receiving a campaign contribution in exchange.Show full reasoning

So, first of all, you’re cherry picking quotes out of there .. You let me answer, and I’ll answer you … Mr. Chairman, I didn’t come here to be insulted. First of all, I didn’t help them,

This is a fragment of exchange during what appears to be a hearing, with Hawley pushing back against an unnamed chairman/questioner regarding cherry-picked quotes and an accusation.Show full reasoning

They complained to you for upwards of an hour about state investigators going after them, and they begged you to help them, and you agreed to it, amazingly. And we know you did, because it’s all caught on tape.

This statement appears to be part of a hearing exchange directed at a non-congressional individual (likely a witness or executive) about…Show full reasoning

It’s my hearing, pal,

This is a bare fragment with no identifiable target, policy content, or named individual.Show full reasoning

I’m reading the transcript. The amount of money circulating in our community today is powerful. And we haven’t realized it in a meaningful way. And you said, give me the specifics. And nine days later, you took $10,000 f…

This statement appears to be an excerpt from a hearing exchange, likely quoting or referencing testimony/transcript with an unnamed 'sir' being addressed.Show full reasoning

You made pledge after pledge to them. You said, ‘we’ve got to make sure this guy who’s investigating them stops it.’ You said, ‘you have my attention. I’m concerned about this.’ You said, ‘let’s go fight these people, me…

This statement appears to be part of a hearing exchange (likely Senate Judiciary or Banking Committee questioning) directed at a witness —…Show full reasoning

…gram came to you in your official office in the state capitol of December 11th, 2021, and asked for your help in getting investigators off their backs,

This fragment appears to be part of a pointed question/accusation directed at a specific official (unnamed in this excerpt, likely a state executive) regarding the Feeding Our Future fraud scandal.Show full reasoning

That's why I am introducing new legislation to ban the use of mifepristone for abortion and empower women to sue its manufacturers. Congress must act now to protect the health and safety of women.

This statement describes Hawley's own legislative proposal regarding mifepristone without naming or blaming any specific opposing member, party, or bloc.Show full reasoning

The science is clear: The chemical abortion drug is inherently dangerous to women and prone to abuse. Yet major companies like Danco Laboratories are making billions off it,

This statement criticizes a pharmaceutical company (Danco Laboratories) and makes a policy claim about a drug's safety, but does not target…Show full reasoning

Congress must ban the chemical abortion drug and empower women to sue its manufacturers.

This is a policy position statement advocating for a specific legislative action (banning a drug and creating liability for manufacturers).Show full reasoning

No amount of profit justifies what has happened to these women,

This is a brief fragment expressing concern about harm to unnamed women, likely referring to a corporate or industry practice, but it does…Show full reasoning

If the House fails to act immediately as part of reconciliation, billions of Federal dollars will go to Planned Parenthood and other medical 'providers' for hormones, puberty blockers, and irreversible treatments for minor children,

The statement does not name a specific opposing member or explicitly blame the Democratic party as a bloc, but it is a targeted, loaded…Show full reasoning

The Senate just passed my legislation with Tim Tebow to rescue thousands of children trapped in sex trafficking,

This statement is a factual announcement about passage of legislation, crediting a named collaborator (Tim Tebow, a private citizen/former athlete, not a sitting member of Congress).Show full reasoning

The world didn’t end. What happened in Wisconsin, and now in Georgia, for example, Georgia, which I think skews red, I think we’d agree, and after the law they elected two Democrat senators.

This statement discusses election outcomes in Wisconsin and Georgia following a law (likely a voting law) without praising, blaming, or…Show full reasoning

I’m a Democrat that’s not going to freak out, you know,

This brief statement is a self-description ('I'm a Democrat that's not going to freak out') with no specific opposing party, member, or own-party figure named or criticized.Show full reasoning

So do you think the war goals have already been met? I think that, yes, it’s been very successful. And I can’t [understand why] we can’t celebrate that so far,

This statement is a comment about war goals/success in a conflict, with no specific targeted criticism or praise directed at a congressional party, bloc, or named member of Congress.Show full reasoning

They should kill him, too,

This is a short, decontextualized fragment ('They should kill him, too') that does not identify any political party, congressional member, or policy position.Show full reasoning

…Ohio and Florida, of course. And now I have a unique perspective on that too, as in 2019, as I was lieutenant governor, the Republicans in Pennsylvania pushed for mail-in voting.

Fetterman is defending mail-in voting by pointing to Republican-led states (Ohio, Florida) as examples of it working well, and noting that Pennsylvania Republicans themselves pushed for mail-in voting in 2019.Show full reasoning

The Takeout with Major Garrett

This is merely the title of a media program/podcast appearance, with no substantive content, targeted comment, or policy discussion present.

I don’t support [it] in its current state to vote Save America. And the president is constantly critical on mail-in voting, and that’s ridiculous,

Fetterman criticizes the President's (Trump's) stance on mail-in voting, calling it 'ridiculous.' This is a targeted comment at a specific…Show full reasoning

So it seems like that's what he's zeroing in on and, as long as he continues, yes, absolutely.

This fragment lacks any identifiable target - it references an unnamed 'he' with no context about who this is or what political conduct is being discussed.Show full reasoning

That's the same thing about immigration, root out all of the criminals and deport them . And now I'm very supportive of Medicaid, obviously, but now root out all of the kinds of fraud,

This statement discusses policy positions (immigration enforcement and Medicaid fraud) in general terms without naming or blaming any specific member of Congress, party bloc, or political opponent.Show full reasoning

I think it's entirely appropriate. I mean, it's — what we're discovering. There was a lot of fraud in Medicaid , and now let's root that out!

This is a brief comment endorsing efforts to root out Medicaid fraud.Show full reasoning

not sure why it’s controversial to anyone to appreciate and celebrate wiping out 49 leaders of one of the most evil regimes in recorded history,

This statement expresses a view about celebrating the elimination of leaders of an 'evil regime' but does not target a specific opposing political party, a fellow member of Congress, or the speaker's own party.Show full reasoning

You want to disagree, but to imply that someone in one of the most gross kinds of terms like that — it’s like, hey, shouldn’t we agree, eliminate all the waste? If it exists under my purview, let’s eliminate it. Let’s ca…

This statement critiques a rhetorical tactic (implying someone is a pedophile in a policy disagreement) without naming a specific individual, party, or bloc as the source of that tactic.Show full reasoning

Why can’t you celebrate any journalist or any activist doing that? And Governor Newsom put out a disgusting video implying that he’s a pedophile or he’s that … why? That’s kind of a smear,

Fetterman, a Democrat, is criticizing California Governor Gavin Newsom, also a Democrat, making this own-party criticism.Show full reasoning

literally the only Democrat in America, uh, in Congress, that I've come across that's saying, I think it's a great thing to break and destroy the Iranian regime. I think it's entirely appropriate to hold them accountable.

Fetterman contrasts his own position on Iran policy with what he portrays as the rest of his party's stance, implying he is an outlier among Democrats for supporting a hardline approach.Show full reasoning

It should remind everybody how important ICE is for our security,

This statement is a brief remark about the importance of ICE for security, with no specific opposing party member, bloc, or own-party figure named or blamed.Show full reasoning

From what I read, the individual that was accused of killing [Gorman]. He was arrested for shoplifting. That’s why I was the Democratic lead on Laken Riley,

This statement is Fetterman explaining his own legislative rationale (being the Democratic lead on the Laken Riley Act) by referencing a specific criminal case.Show full reasoning

We are calling on Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger and Virginia's sanctuary politicians to commit to not releasing this murderer and violent career criminal from their jail without notifying ICE,

Fetterman is a Democrat directing criticism at Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger, also a Democrat, along with unnamed 'sanctuary…Show full reasoning

If you’re here in the country illegally already, and you’re breaking the law, like — ya gotta go,

This is a policy statement about immigration enforcement with no specific opposing party, member, or own-party figure targeted for blame or praise.Show full reasoning

Lighten up, Francis,

This is a brief pop-culture reference/quip ('Lighten up, Francis' is a line from the movie Stripes) with no identifiable political target,…Show full reasoning

How many Democrats are talking about that case? I think probably none,

Fetterman, a Democrat, is criticizing his own party for reportedly not discussing an unspecified case.Show full reasoning

And you have millions of people from abroad coming and millions of Americans joining these two.

This fragment is a vague, decontextualized statement about people 'from abroad' and Americans joining some unspecified event or movement.Show full reasoning

[It’s] just getting harder and harder to justify extending this shutdown,

This statement expresses Fetterman's personal view that the shutdown is becoming harder to justify, but it does not name or target any specific opposing member, party bloc, or even his own party.Show full reasoning

Preparations are significantly behind and now we're 77 days out and this is still shut down. ,

The statement is a brief factual/informational comment about preparations being behind schedule and a shutdown ongoing at 77 days.Show full reasoning

I could never justify this from the start, but here we are day 39, 40? It's like, how long are you gonna continue that?

Fetterman is expressing frustration with an ongoing strategy (likely his own party's approach to a government shutdown standoff, given the…Show full reasoning

…n event with the line of succession for the U.S. government. After witnessing last night, drop the TDS and build the White House ballroom for events exactly like these.

Fetterman, a Democrat, is criticizing what he characterizes as reflexive anti-Trump sentiment ('TDS' / Trump Derangement Syndrome) among…Show full reasoning

We were there front and center,

This is a fragment with no discernible target - no specific official, party, or political conduct is referenced.Show full reasoning

Especially celebrating some of the worst ideas that ever visited humanity.

This fragment lacks any identifiable target—no specific person, party, or political conduct is named or referenced.Show full reasoning

I don't know if they realize the irony in many of those things right now.

This statement is a fragment with no clear identifiable target - it doesn't name a specific individual, party, or policy.Show full reasoning

Your kids should be in school. My kids were in school. And you can have beliefs, but I really believe that education is the most important thing, and that's a value that we can't forget,

This statement expresses a general value about the importance of education and keeping kids in school, without naming or targeting any specific member of Congress, party, or political bloc.Show full reasoning

These kinds of protests are being funded by billionaires against billionaires,

This statement is a general, vague comment about protest funding ('billionaires against billionaires') without naming any specific member of Congress, party bloc, or political figure.Show full reasoning

…a marriage of the Palestinian, the anti-ICE, the abolish ICE and now turning it into like an orgy of socialism here,

Fetterman, a Democrat, is mocking a cluster of positions (Palestinian solidarity, anti-ICE/abolish ICE, socialism) that are generally…Show full reasoning