Full statement history

Republicans are going to stand with our Border Patrol, with our law enforcement agencies and we're going to ensure that they are funded, not only today but well into the future,

This statement is a positive self-identification with the speaker's own party ('Republicans are going to stand with...') rather than criticism or praise of the opposing party.Show full reasoning

the talking filibuster issue is one which there is not, certainly, a unified Republican conference, and there would have to be.

Thune is commenting on internal Republican disagreement over the 'talking filibuster' issue, acknowledging that his own party's conference is not unified on the matter.Show full reasoning

But Democrats aren’t voting for this, I’m just telling you. And the Republicans are not getting rid of the legislative filibus…

The statement references Democrats as a bloc predicting they won't support an unspecified measure, and also references Republicans' (the speaker's own party) stance on the filibuster.Show full reasoning

…got to pivot and go all in to make sure that we keep Texas red, that he wins, and that we keep a far-left liberal out of the United States Senate.

Thune, a Republican, frames the unnamed Democratic opponent categorically as a 'far-left liberal' with no reference to any specific policy…Show full reasoning

Because, you know, losing is not an option when it comes to the state of Texas, and what it means for our majority in the Senate.

Thune frames the Texas Senate race purely in terms of maintaining 'our majority,' implicitly casting the contest as a zero-sum fight against the opposing party without naming any individual, policy, or vote.Show full reasoning

All of the things that the Democrats made this about, which was supposed to be about reforms to the way that ICE and Border Patrol operate -- they get none of that,

Thune criticizes Democrats as a bloc over the outcome of negotiations regarding ICE/Border Patrol reforms.Show full reasoning

And now, we're going to fund those agencies for three years into the future. The only thing the Democrats got out of this was they now own the issue of open borders and defund law enforcement.

The speaker directly targets Democrats as a bloc, framing them monolithically as owning 'open borders and defund law enforcement' — a…Show full reasoning

That is not acceptable to Republicans in Congress, nor is it to the American people. We cannot allow Democrats to any longer put the safety of the American public at risk through their open border policies, so we are taking that off the table,

Thune targets Democrats as a bloc, characterizing their border policy as deliberately endangering public safety ('open border policies'), without citing a specific bill, vote, or named individual's action.Show full reasoning

… entirely so that bipartisan negotiations could continue, it is now abundantly clear that Democrats place allegiance to their radical left-wing base above all else -- including their own power of the purse -- which means open borders and protecting crim…

The speaker directly targets Democrats as a bloc, attributing their rejection of a 60-day CR to 'allegiance to their radical left-wing…Show full reasoning

The Democrats up here on the Hill are so afraid of their far-left base,

This statement targets the Democratic Party as an undifferentiated bloc, characterizing them collectively as motivated by fear of their…Show full reasoning

My impression is, at least up until now, that the edict has gone out from the paternalistic Democrat fathers that none of their children should be talking to Republicans about how to solve this problem in a way that gets them actual reforms in place,

This statement targets the opposing party (Democrats) as a monolithic bloc, using a demeaning familial metaphor ('paternalistic Democrat…Show full reasoning

And I think the far-left base, their demand right now, is defund ICE, defund law enforcement, which is not, by any stretch, a reasonable position.

Thune targets the 'far-left base' as a monolithic bloc, attributing to it a specific policy stance (defunding ICE/law enforcement), which…Show full reasoning

…bill. There are a lot of things out there, Larry, that we could be working on together if the Democrats weren’t afflicted with such a case of Trump derangement syndrome that they are blinded and unable to function in a way that even delivers on the very basi…

Thune attacks Democrats as an undifferentiated bloc, framing them as pathologically 'afflicted' with 'Trump derangement syndrome' and…Show full reasoning

…te Democrats don't let events play out. And so I am glad to see Democrats, after 38 days, back down from the maximalist and, frankly, insane position they have held since September. The Democrat leader's proposal is a nonstarter for the Republican majority. The Democrat…

The speaker (Thune, R) directs sustained criticism at Democrats as a bloc, calling their position 'insane,' citing specific legislative…Show full reasoning

… days into an entirely avoidable government shutdown. I say ``avoidable'' because it was. Democrats instigated this shutdown by rejecting a clean, nonpartisan funding resolution. Republicans weren't asking them to swallow a bunch of new conservative policies. There is…

Thune directs sustained blame at Democrats as a bloc for the shutdown, repeatedly using categorical framing ('Democrats instigated,' 'the…Show full reasoning